![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRDAFYgKcFFETY1c5ogJwNTPcMuXNpiECwwHpIwLnM9iK14KEJUAo1Po5de9309AhEIEJ6Yw8xrTwAgWclUDd_DOz6AlqDi3xD64pbEgQChEdjhDXyceXCqTU_XVJAKsisrLWJ3foGvcA/s320/Ex12-1-100x-DF.jpg)
These are my titanium/PVP nanowires. Aren't they be-a-utiful?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggavYEEKdVijdnZRYgExoYGAPBZVVukBiNwqk-a9YQrV1TStzZuKAicOEwixegFjMzcaAfx0QnY3mgPb6bKSQ25jWx2LLDmHi0XRUbY_0UGgt4VUVdosOJ62SO1CeWpgGbq0Wp66PA1Ug/s320/Ex15-1-20x-DF.jpg)
This is a different sample, at 20x instead of 100x.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEim2VFhzYcqF8lQgKydOuanhzWzgyyLl-rxSB5Lvi_MVlADisx2LnGYhht4ub5p5ATRqadFOOjcAO8XFX-icgqx3-aCf9C-hTck8yluXHW1pLnLgqDbHiysNzfALVFHnSJ9XagLJGh-JMs/s320/Solution+test-100x-DF-A2+curls.jpg)
Yet another sample--did I mention that I was up to 84? At ten photos per sample, I'm only about a quarter of the way through the photographing/contact angle analysis. But the monotony does lead to some interesting data.
2 comments:
How does monotony lead to interesting data?
You should know this; it's the very nature of experimentation. I do the same thing over and over and over again--that's the monotonous part. But I do that same thing to nanowire samples created from 27 different combinations of electrospinning parameters. Thus the data I get is interesting because it tells me what affect those parameters had on the wire samples and their corresponding morphology and contact angles. --You probably didn't want to know all that...
Post a Comment